Review paper on research paper
Are the methods suitable to investigate the research question and test the hypotheses?
When starting from scratch, reviewing the literature can require a titanic amount of work. The kind of research may vary depending on your field or the topic experiments, survey, interview, questionnaire, etc.
I want to give them honest feedback of the same type that I hope to receive when I submit a paper. Also think carefully about who your intended audience will be. Then I make specific comments on each section, listing the major questions or concerns.
Types of review paper
Organizing the Paper: Use topic headings. Is it aimed at new post graduate students who are just getting into the field and need somewhere to start? Does the theoretical argument make sense? I usually sit on the review for a day and then reread it to be sure it is balanced and fair before deciding anything. In my experience, they are unlikely to write a poor quality review; they might be more likely to accept the invitation, as senior scientists are typically overwhelmed with review requests; and the opportunity to review a manuscript can help support their professional development. I even selectively check individual numbers to see whether they are statistically plausible. Mostly I am concerned with credibility: Could this methodology have answered their question? I almost never print out papers for review; I prefer to work with the electronic version. Plan what these figures will be in your paper. Reviewing is a great learning experience and an exciting thing to do. Does it contribute to our knowledge, or is it old wine in new bottles? First, make sure that you are an expert in the subject and aware of the recent literature on the topic you have in mind. The topic must at least be: interesting to you ideally, you should have come across a series of recent papers related to your line of work that call for a critical summary , an important aspect of the field so that many readers will be interested in the review and there will be enough material to write it , and a well-defined issue otherwise you could potentially include thousands of publications, which would make the review unhelpful. When starting from scratch, reviewing the literature can require a titanic amount of work. Using a copy of the manuscript that I first marked up with any questions that I had, I write a brief summary of what the paper is about and what I feel about its solidity.
Since obtaining tenure, I always sign my reviews. I see it as a tit-for-tat duty: Since I am an active researcher and I submit papers, hoping for really helpful, constructive comments, it just makes sense that I do the same for others.
based on 96 review