An analysis of the innocence in the 12 angry men

The characters are less specific individuals and more of a general representation of the American population. Conversely, we see another side of justice proposed by the other members of the jury, who feel that the accused is clearly guilty, and anything other than conviction and execution is short of justice.

?12 angry men? study guide answers

All but one were convinced the boy on trial was guilty of first degree murder based on eye witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. While the trial is not depicted in the film, the jury deliberations are the central focus and examine several aspects of organization change and the obstacles that must be overcome in order to come to a unanimous agreement over the guilt or innocence of the accused.

12 angry men evidence

What they do to you, how they kill you every day. This is clearly evident in the movie 12 Angry Men. I find myself to be most like him because he is unbiased, empathetic and is analytic. You know how looking at a math problem similar to the one you're stuck on can help you get unstuck?

12 angry men quotes

Kibin does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the essays in the library; essay content should not be construed as advice.

Reading example essays works the same way! From the beginning of the play the audience can see the jury room is split into warring blocks between those who vouch for a guilty verdict and those who vouch a non-guilty verdict. While, conspicuously, the race of the accused is never certain, we do understand that he is a minority of some sort in the film, the actor playing the accused was Italianand this quickly becomes a heated issue among the jurors, especially for 9th Jurorwho refers to the accused as "one of them.

An analysis of the innocence in the 12 angry men

The play juxtaposes a presumably wealthy stock broker 4th Juror with someone who has admittedly lived in the slums his entire life 5th Juror , and we seem to have every level of working man in between. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. The jurors are simply referred to as a number, and the defendant is referred to as "defendant," "accused," "boy," etc. At first none of the men seem to care about the boy. He also counted the votes and kept record of how many and who voted guilty or not guilty. As a group that was formed solely. In order to vote for acquittal, you would need to accept everything outlined above. What they do to you, how they kill you every day. Simpson Got Away With Murder for much of the following analysis. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Prejudice and reasonable doubt are themes that are just as significant, by driving the narrative of the drama throughout the play. Prejudice and the conflict that comes along with it brings out the personalities of each of the characters and allows the audience to see the ideas, beliefs and opinions of the Jurors, making this theme is significant. Only a stone-hearted soul could fail to be moved watching Henry Fonda slowly, methodically sway 11 other jurors, one by one, employing only reason, compassion, and common sense as weapons.
Rated 5/10 based on 58 review
12 Angry Men Analysis